![]()
The Maeslant Barrier is not an isolated structure. Rotterdam and environs are safe on account of a system of protective structures. The other elements of the Europoort Barrier are the Hartel Barrier – a storm-surge barrier in the Hartel Canal – and the dyke reinforcements in the tidal river area. The Europoort Barrier protects the estuary area from the risk of water flooding in from the Europoort area, which is in free communication with the sea.
The Europort Barrier is not a continuous dike but contains stretches of more elevated land that are officially designated as sea defences. In contrast to most other barriers, the Europort barrier does not need to be a high or strong dike. A certain amount of water is allowed to flow over it: the delta area further inland provides an adequate buffer for the water.
![]()
Apart from the construction of the storm surge barrier, supplementary dike reinforcements are necessary in the delta
area. The storm surge barrier looses effect upstream in the delta area (the river level being the decisive factor).
![]()
After the decision was taken that a
barrier had to be installed in
the Europort area, the location had then
to be decided. There proved to be many possibilities. The various possible
locations were evaluated in terms of reliability, shipping traffic,
technological requirements, time, cost and
wider social considerations such as
harmonisation with the landscape and
implications for commercial activity.

![]()
The decision to construct a storm surge
barrier in the New Waterway also
necessitated a barrier in the Europort area. Otherwise, when the New Waterway
Storm Surge Barrier is closed, too much
seawater can flow in through the Europort
area and the safety of South Holland
becomes threatened.
During the same period - the late 1980s - the Rotterdam Municipal Port Management explored ways of improving the inland shipping links between the Maasvlakte and the hinterland, to cope with the growth in container and bulk transhipment. In conditions of wind force 5 or more the existing shipping routes to the Maasvlakte are unsafe, and the ensuing delays would detract from the competitiveness of the Port of Rotterdam.
The Department of Public Works and Water Management and the Rotterdam Municipal Port Management jointly explore a solution. This takes the form of a barrier in the Europort area and creating an opening in the Beer Dam.
These projects have various consequences
![]()
Together with the New Waterway Storm Surge
Barrier and a limited dyke-stengthening program, the Europort Barrier completes
the Delta Project, thus protecting South
Holland against high water.
Opening the Beer Dam greatly improves the economic and strategic position of the Port of Rotterdam. The Maasvlakte docks can be reached more easily and safely. A number of companies in the Europort, however, will suffer disadvantages from the opening of the Beer Dam.
The Europort Barrier and Open Beer Dam are
examples of projects serving a collective
interest, with adverse consequences for a
limited number of businesses.
![]()
Europort Barrier Project Manager
"Together with the New Waterway Storm
Surge Barrier and a limited dike-strengthening program, the Europort Barrier forms
the final piece of the Delta Project,
protecting South Holland against the sea.
In determining the position of the barrier
all the various interests have been
weighed as carefully as possible. The
Department of Public Works and Water Management is always
required to reconcile maximum individual
legal certainty and the public interest.
Decisions therefore take time and cost money. An Open Beer Dam benefits inland
shipping. Not all the firms in the
Europort and Botlek, however, stand to
benefit directly but will find themselves
affected by construction activities.
Partly for this reason compensation
arrangements have been drawn up for them."
![]()
Open Beer Dam Project
Manager, Rotterdam Municipal Port
Management
"Opening the Beer Dam is essential
in order to cope with the increase in
domestic container shipping. The
Maasvlakte will be made more accessible.
We now have 300 metres of domestic
shipping wharf-space and 3000 metres for
maritime shipping. All the quays will
shortly become dual-purpose, meaning that
we can avoid the need for additional
activities since no further transhipment
will be required. In some cases the
containers from ocean-going steamers can
be transferred directly onto barges."
![]()
Director Europort/Botlek Interest Foundation
"Everyone strongly advocates the
completion of the Delta Project with the
Europort Barrier. We are therefore clear
about the need for an Open Beer Dam. This
will serve the interests of domestic
shipping and container traffic. But a
limited number of businesses (for example
pipeline owners) will be carrying the can
and don't benefit in any way. If the
public interest needs to be served, the
general public must also stump up the costs."